I may be a Liberal to my very core, but I
am not celebrating [one year in office]. I am trying very hard to understand Keith Colwell's
recent performance as agriculture minister. The only conclusion I can
draw is that Colwell knows absolutely nothing about agriculture in Nova
Scotia. You see, I grew up on a sustenance farm in Antigonish County. We
had a dairy cow that was bred beef every year and we also raised our
own meat birds and laying hens. It was how my parents managed to feed
four kids while working and living around the poverty line, like so many
rural residents. We weren't alone, most of our neighbours did the same.
It is a way to make rural life work. Not everyone wants to live and
raise their kids in a city.
So when I see the agricultural
minister on Sun News, of all places, stating his absolute support for
the turkey board's decision to shut down small processors right before
Thanksgiving, I have to wonder about his suitability as minister. These
turkeys were bought and raised to be ready for the holidays/winter food
stocks. Since you have to sign an affidavit to buy those chicks, the
turkey board could have made their stance known then and let people
decide whether they wanted to continue knowing they would be forced to
use a provincial processor.
Instead, the board lets these people
buy and raise the birds for months and then shuts down the local
processors. Unless there was some documented evidence of how these local
butchers were failing public heath, this could have waited until next
year's crop of chicks. In Gordon Fraser's case, I suspect after 36 years
of processing birds without incident, he probably could have made it
through year 37. It was either a stupid, short-sighted decision or an
intentionally-malicious decision on the part of the board. Having
reviewed the social media efforts of the turkey marketing board, I'm leaning towards the former.
Even
then, it still would have been the wrong decision. Most farmers have
other jobs, and sustenance farmers definitely have other jobs. For the
ones that don't possess the knowledge and facilities to butcher their
own birds, they have to find time outside of work to get their birds to
the butcher and picked them back up. Gas is also expensive. If it means a
day or two off work, possibly without pay, and a long drive to get them
to a provincial facility, they may not do it next year. And that is the
exact opposite of what an agriculture minister should want.
I
am aware that this province is in a deep dark fiscal hole and farming
is, decidedly, not glamorous. Nor is it lucrative. Farmers just grow our
food and food for their own families. As agriculture minister, the job
is to support those that are already farming, especially the ones doing
it to feed their families, and to bring in newcomers. Our rural
communities are struggling with declining and aging populations. Either
we want people to live there or we don't. If we want people to live
there, we need to find reasons for them to live there. Food, by way of
farming, can be a reason. There's the eat local movement, there's the
sustainable food movement, the slow food movement, the organic movement,
and the farmer's market/meet your farmer movement, and of course, basic
food security. Then there's foodies, there's tons of those. Did you
know artisanal butchery is a thing? Heritage turkeys and pigs?
Agriculture won't solve our deficit, but there's an awful lot of people
willing to pay top dollar for the right agricultural products. We just
need to grow them and we've got the land and the communities to do it.
I've
met lots of folks who love rural life and working off the land, I have
yet to meet a call center worker who shares the same enthusiasm for
their job. If the current rules make it harder for people to grow food,
then the rules need to be modernized. It's a majority government, you
have the power to pass legislation. Proper food safety is adaptable to
the environment in which it occurs. You can start with new rules for
local processors, because we can either make it easier for people to
live in rural communities or we can relocate them all to urban centers
and frack the countryside into oblivion.
I know which future I want for Nova Scotia.
As
an aside, I noticed today Colwell's latest step as agricultural
minister is to craft a law making it illegal to abandon animals, with a
special focus on cats. As an animal lover, I applaud the sentiment, but
aside from shameless vote buying what is this going to accomplish? Many
cats and dogs are abandoned at or because of sexual maturity when there
is no money to have them fixed/deal with offspring. What penalty will be
imposed on someone with no money? Beyond farming it out to an agency,
what plan is in place to enforce these new laws? How do you prove
abandonment without proof of ownership? Cats aren't licensed. Will it be
cheaper than subsidizing a spay and neuter program, one that would not
penalize people for being poor?
The time to pander for votes and go for easy wins is somewhere in year three, not now. Now is the time to fix things.
Hooray!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, dear Oracle! It's not just in Nova Scotia that "agriculture ministers" prove themselves to be asses, but in Ontario as well. We're about to lose our ONLY agricultural college in Eastern Ontario because the current minister hasn't got a clue why we need it.
Not only is it educating the farmers, butchers and veterinarians of the future, it's the home of Eastern Ontario Breeders, the company that supplies semen for many of the beef and dairy farmers in Ontario and Quebec. We're going to lose all that, because the Toronto-centric minister can't see the point of anything that's not in Southern Ontario. The University of Guelph will be okay, but the satellite campus at Kemptville College may disappear.
Such a shame!
Agreed!
ReplyDelete